Instance - app1-2


	Raw This is the CCM image before the decomposition procedure has been applied.	Decomposed This is the CCM image after a decomposition procedure has been applied. This is the image used by the MIC's image-based comparisons for this query instance.	Composite of MIC Top 5 Composite of the five decomposed CCM images from the MIC Top 5.	Composite of MIPLIB Top 5 Composite of the five decomposed CCM images from the MIPLIB Top 5.	Model Group Composite Image Composite of the decomposed CCM images for every instance in the same model group as this query.

Decomposed These decomposed images were created by GCG.
Name	app1-1 [MIPLIB]	pizza27i [MIPLIB]	pizza78i [MIPLIB]	k1mushroomi [MIPLIB]	splice1k1i [MIPLIB]
Rank / ISS The image-based structural similarity (ISS) metric measures the Euclidean distance between the image-based feature vectors for the query instance and all other instances. A smaller ISS value indicates greater similarity.	1 / 0.391	2 / 0.437	3 / 0.459	4 / 0.528	5 / 0.664
Raw These images represent the CCM images in their raw forms (before any decomposition was applied) for the MIC top 5.

Decomposed These decomposed images were created by GCG.
Name	app1-1 [MIPLIB]	loopha13 [MIPLIB]	fhnw-schedule-pairb400 [MIPLIB]	fhnw-schedule-pairb200 [MIPLIB]	rocII-8-11 [MIPLIB]
Rank / ISS The image-based structural similarity (ISS) metric measures the Euclidean distance between the image-based feature vectors for the query instance and all model groups. A smaller ISS value indicates greater similarity.	1 / 0.391	46 / 0.986	181 / 1.197	224 / 1.245	660 / 1.691
Raw These images represent the CCM images in their raw forms (before any decomposition was applied) for the MIPLIB top 5.

Instance Summary

The table below contains summary information for app1-2, the five most similar instances to app1-2 according to the MIC, and the five most similar instances to app1-2 according to MIPLIB 2017.

	INSTANCE	SUBMITTER	DESCRIPTION	ISS	RANK
Parent Instance	app1-2 [MIPLIB]	Emilie Danna	Undisclosed industrial application from Google	0.000000	-
MIC Top 5	app1-1 [MIPLIB]	Emilie Danna	The archive contains 5 instances coming from 3 applications.app1 is interesting because the continuous variables (w) drive the model.Some solvers have numerical problems on app2 models: some solutions found violate the constraints by a small amount.app2 and app3 models are easy to solve. But they don't solve fast enough for the time limit I have in mind so I'd like to propose them for inclusion in MIPLIB.	0.390606	1
	pizza27i [MIPLIB]	Gleb Belov	These are the instances from MiniZinc Challenges 2012-2016 (see www.minizinc.org), compiled for MIP WITH INDICATOR CONSTRAINTS using the develop branch of MiniZinc and CPLEX 12.7.1 on 30 April 2017. Thus, these instances can only be handled by solvers accepting indicator constraints. For instances compiled with big-M/domain decomposition only, see my previous submission to MIPLIB.To recompile, create a directory MODELS, a list lst12_16.txt of the instances with full paths to mzn/dzn files of each instance per line, and say$> ~/install/libmzn/tests/benchmarking/mzn-test.py -l ../lst12_16.txt -slvPrf MZN-CPLEX -debug 1 -addOption "-timeout 3 -D fIndConstr=true -D fMIPdomains=false" -useJoinedName "-writeModel MODELS_IND/%s.mps" Alternatively, you can compile individual instance as follows: $> mzn-cplex -v -s -G linear -output-time ../challenge_2012_2016/mznc2016_probs/zephyrus/zephyrus.mzn ../challenge_2012_2016/mznc2016_p/zephyrus/14__8__6__3.dzn -a -timeout 3 -D fIndConstr=true -D fMIPdomains=false -writeModel MODELS_IND/challenge_2012_2016mznc2016_probszephyruszephyrusmzn-challenge_2012_2016mznc2016_probszephyrus14__8__6__3dzn.mps	0.437430	2
	pizza78i [MIPLIB]	Gleb Belov	These are the instances from MiniZinc Challenges 2012-2016 (see www.minizinc.org), compiled for MIP WITH INDICATOR CONSTRAINTS using the develop branch of MiniZinc and CPLEX 12.7.1 on 30 April 2017. Thus, these instances can only be handled by solvers accepting indicator constraints. For instances compiled with big-M/domain decomposition only, see my previous submission to MIPLIB.To recompile, create a directory MODELS, a list lst12_16.txt of the instances with full paths to mzn/dzn files of each instance per line, and say$> ~/install/libmzn/tests/benchmarking/mzn-test.py -l ../lst12_16.txt -slvPrf MZN-CPLEX -debug 1 -addOption "-timeout 3 -D fIndConstr=true -D fMIPdomains=false" -useJoinedName "-writeModel MODELS_IND/%s.mps" Alternatively, you can compile individual instance as follows: $> mzn-cplex -v -s -G linear -output-time ../challenge_2012_2016/mznc2016_probs/zephyrus/zephyrus.mzn ../challenge_2012_2016/mznc2016_p/zephyrus/14__8__6__3.dzn -a -timeout 3 -D fIndConstr=true -D fMIPdomains=false -writeModel MODELS_IND/challenge_2012_2016mznc2016_probszephyruszephyrusmzn-challenge_2012_2016mznc2016_probszephyrus14__8__6__3dzn.mps	0.458985	3
	k1mushroomi [MIPLIB]	Gleb Belov	These are the instances from MiniZinc Challenges 2012-2016 (see www.minizinc.org), compiled for MIP WITH INDICATOR CONSTRAINTS using the develop branch of MiniZinc and CPLEX 12.7.1 on 30 April 2017. Thus, these instances can only be handled by solvers accepting indicator constraints. For instances compiled with big-M/domain decomposition only, see my previous submission to MIPLIB.To recompile, create a directory MODELS, a list lst12_16.txt of the instances with full paths to mzn/dzn files of each instance per line, and say$> ~/install/libmzn/tests/benchmarking/mzn-test.py -l ../lst12_16.txt -slvPrf MZN-CPLEX -debug 1 -addOption "-timeout 3 -D fIndConstr=true -D fMIPdomains=false" -useJoinedName "-writeModel MODELS_IND/%s.mps" Alternatively, you can compile individual instance as follows: $> mzn-cplex -v -s -G linear -output-time ../challenge_2012_2016/mznc2016_probs/zephyrus/zephyrus.mzn ../challenge_2012_2016/mznc2016_p/zephyrus/14__8__6__3.dzn -a -timeout 3 -D fIndConstr=true -D fMIPdomains=false -writeModel MODELS_IND/challenge_2012_2016mznc2016_probszephyruszephyrusmzn-challenge_2012_2016mznc2016_probszephyrus14__8__6__3dzn.mps	0.528045	4
	splice1k1i [MIPLIB]	Gleb Belov	These are the instances from MiniZinc Challenges 2012-2016 (see www.minizinc.org), compiled for MIP WITH INDICATOR CONSTRAINTS using the develop branch of MiniZinc and CPLEX 12.7.1 on 30 April 2017. Thus, these instances can only be handled by solvers accepting indicator constraints. For instances compiled with big-M/domain decomposition only, see my previous submission to MIPLIB.To recompile, create a directory MODELS, a list lst12_16.txt of the instances with full paths to mzn/dzn files of each instance per line, and say$> ~/install/libmzn/tests/benchmarking/mzn-test.py -l ../lst12_16.txt -slvPrf MZN-CPLEX -debug 1 -addOption "-timeout 3 -D fIndConstr=true -D fMIPdomains=false" -useJoinedName "-writeModel MODELS_IND/%s.mps" Alternatively, you can compile individual instance as follows: $> mzn-cplex -v -s -G linear -output-time ../challenge_2012_2016/mznc2016_probs/zephyrus/zephyrus.mzn ../challenge_2012_2016/mznc2016_p/zephyrus/14__8__6__3.dzn -a -timeout 3 -D fIndConstr=true -D fMIPdomains=false -writeModel MODELS_IND/challenge_2012_2016mznc2016_probszephyruszephyrusmzn-challenge_2012_2016mznc2016_probszephyrus14__8__6__3dzn.mps	0.663740	5
MIPLIB Top 5	app1-1 [MIPLIB]	Emilie Danna	The archive contains 5 instances coming from 3 applications.app1 is interesting because the continuous variables (w) drive the model.Some solvers have numerical problems on app2 models: some solutions found violate the constraints by a small amount.app2 and app3 models are easy to solve. But they don't solve fast enough for the time limit I have in mind so I'd like to propose them for inclusion in MIPLIB.	0.390606	1
	loopha13 [MIPLIB]	Hamideh	This is a Gams model which uses CPLEX as a solver.	0.986248	46
	fhnw-schedule-pairb400 [MIPLIB]	Simon Felix	Continuous-time project scheduling and selection, inspired by an industry use-case. Each project has a value, the sum should be maximized. Each project has a deadline, and an earliest start date. Three formulations of the same problem ("Pair A", "Pair B" and "Slot") - we expect "Pair B" to be the best formulation.	1.196812	181
	fhnw-schedule-pairb200 [MIPLIB]	Simon Felix	Continuous-time project scheduling and selection, inspired by an industry use-case. Each project has a value, the sum should be maximized. Each project has a deadline, and an earliest start date. Three formulations of the same problem ("Pair A", "Pair B" and "Slot") - we expect "Pair B" to be the best formulation.	1.244975	224
	rocII-8-11 [MIPLIB]	Joerg Rambau	Optimal control model in the deterministic dynamic system given by bounded-confidence dynamics in a system of opinions	1.690687	660

These are model group composite (MGC) images for the MIC top 5 model groups.
Name	pizza	pegsolitaire	neos-pseudoapplication-74	mc	mario
Rank / ISS The image-based structural similarity (ISS) metric measures the Euclidean distance between the image-based feature vectors for the query instance and all other instances. A smaller ISS value indicates greater similarity.	1 / 0.609	2 / 1.099	3 / 1.265	4 / 1.267	5 / 1.423

Model Group Summary

The table below contains summary information for the five most similar model groups to app1-2 according to the MIC.

	MODEL GROUP	SUBMITTER	DESCRIPTION	ISS	RANK
MIC Top 5	pizza	Gleb Belov	These are the models from MiniZinc Challenges 2012-2016 (see www.minizinc.org), compiled for MIP WITH INDICATOR CONSTRAINTS using the develop branch of MiniZinc and CPLEX 12.7.1 on 30 April 2017. Thus, these models can only be handled by solvers accepting indicator constraints. For models compiled with big-M/domain decomposition only, see my previous submission to MIPLIB.To recompile, create a directory MODELS, a list lst12_16.txt of the models with full paths to mzn/dzn files of each model per line, and say$> ~/install/libmzn/tests/benchmarking/mzn-test.py -l ../lst12_16.txt -slvPrf MZN-CPLEX -debug 1 -addOption "-timeout 3 -D fIndConstr=true -D fMIPdomains=false" -useJoinedName "-writeModel MODELS_IND/%s.mps" Alternatively, you can compile individual model as follows: $> mzn-cplex -v -s -G linear -output-time ../challenge_2012_2016/mznc2016_probs/zephyrus/zephyrus.mzn ../challenge_2012_2016/mznc2016_p/zephyrus/14__8__6__3.dzn -a -timeout 3 -D fIndConstr=true -D fMIPdomains=false -writeModel MODELS_IND/challenge_2012_2016mznc2016_probszephyruszephyrusmzn-challenge_2012_2016mznc2016_probszephyrus14__8__6__3dzn.mps	0.608971	1
	pegsolitaire	Hiroshige Dan	Model to solve model of a board game "Peg solitaire"	1.099364	2
	neos-pseudoapplication-74	Jeff Linderoth	(None provided)	1.265297	3
	mc	F. Ortega, L. Wolsey	Fixed cost network flow problems	1.266640	4
	mario	Gleb Belov	These are the models from MiniZinc Challenges 2012-2016 (see www.minizinc.org), compiled for MIP WITH INDICATOR CONSTRAINTS using the develop branch of MiniZinc and CPLEX 12.7.1 on 30 April 2017. Thus, these models can only be handled by solvers accepting indicator constraints. For models compiled with big-M/domain decomposition only, see my previous submission to MIPLIB.To recompile, create a directory MODELS, a list lst12_16.txt of the models with full paths to mzn/dzn files of each model per line, and say$> ~/install/libmzn/tests/benchmarking/mzn-test.py -l ../lst12_16.txt -slvPrf MZN-CPLEX -debug 1 -addOption "-timeout 3 -D fIndConstr=true -D fMIPdomains=false" -useJoinedName "-writeModel MODELS_IND/%s.mps" Alternatively, you can compile individual model as follows: $> mzn-cplex -v -s -G linear -output-time ../challenge_2012_2016/mznc2016_probs/zephyrus/zephyrus.mzn ../challenge_2012_2016/mznc2016_p/zephyrus/14__8__6__3.dzn -a -timeout 3 -D fIndConstr=true -D fMIPdomains=false -writeModel MODELS_IND/challenge_2012_2016mznc2016_probszephyruszephyrusmzn-challenge_2012_2016mznc2016_probszephyrus14__8__6__3dzn.mps	1.422533	5

Type:	Instance
Submitter:	Emilie Danna
Description:	Undisclosed industrial application from Google
	MIPLIB Entry

Model Group Assignment from MIPLIB:	app
Assigned Model Group Rank/ISS in the MIC:	95 / 2.440

app1-2: Instance-to-Instance Comparison Results

Parent Instance (app1-2)

MIC Top 5 Instances

MIPLIB Top 5 Instances

Instance Summary

app1-2: Instance-to-Model Comparison Results

MIC Top 5 Model Groups

Model Group Summary