×
app2-1: Instance-to-Instance Comparison Results
Type: | Instance |
Submitter: | Emilie Danna |
Description: | The archive contains 5 instances coming from 3 applications.app1 is interesting because the continuous variables (w) drive the model.Some solvers have numerical problems on app2 models: some solutions found violate the constraints by a small amount.app2 and app3 models are easy to solve. But they don't solve fast enough for the time limit I have in mind so I'd like to propose them for inclusion in MIPLIB. |
MIPLIB Entry |
Parent Instance (app2-1)
All other instances below were be compared against this "query" instance.![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Raw
This is the CCM image before the decomposition procedure has been applied.
|
Decomposed
This is the CCM image after a decomposition procedure has been applied. This is the image used by the MIC's image-based comparisons for this query instance.
|
Composite of MIC Top 5
Composite of the five decomposed CCM images from the MIC Top 5.
|
Composite of MIPLIB Top 5
Composite of the five decomposed CCM images from the MIPLIB Top 5.
|
Model Group Composite Image
Composite of the decomposed CCM images for every instance in the same model group as this query.
|
MIC Top 5 Instances
These are the 5 decomposed CCM images that are most similar to decomposed CCM image for the the query instance, according to the ISS metric.![]() ![]() |
Decomposed
These decomposed images were created by GCG.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Name | app2-2 [MIPLIB] | dale-cta [MIPLIB] | h80x6320 [MIPLIB] | stein9inf [MIPLIB] | flugplinf [MIPLIB] | |
Rank / ISS
The image-based structural similarity (ISS) metric measures the Euclidean distance between the image-based feature vectors for the query instance and all other instances. A smaller ISS value indicates greater similarity.
|
1 / 0.321 | 2 / 0.364 | 3 / 0.529 | 4 / 0.766 | 5 / 0.768 | |
Raw
These images represent the CCM images in their raw forms (before any decomposition was applied) for the MIC top 5.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
MIPLIB Top 5 Instances
These are the 5 instances that are most closely related to the query instance, according to the instance statistic-based similarity measure employed by MIPLIB 2017![]() ![]() |
Decomposed
These decomposed images were created by GCG.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Name | app2-2 [MIPLIB] | neos-5140963-mincio [MIPLIB] | sp97ic [MIPLIB] | sp97ar [MIPLIB] | sp98ar [MIPLIB] | |
Rank / ISS
The image-based structural similarity (ISS) metric measures the Euclidean distance between the image-based feature vectors for the query instance and all model groups. A smaller ISS value indicates greater similarity.
|
1 / 0.321 | 87 / 1.100 | 813 / 2.227 | 859 / 2.384 | 895 / 2.600 | |
Raw
These images represent the CCM images in their raw forms (before any decomposition was applied) for the MIPLIB top 5.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Instance Summary
The table below contains summary information for app2-1, the five most similar instances to app2-1 according to the MIC, and the five most similar instances to app2-1 according to MIPLIB 2017.
INSTANCE | SUBMITTER | DESCRIPTION | ISS | RANK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parent Instance | app2-1 [MIPLIB] | Emilie Danna | The archive contains 5 instances coming from 3 applications.app1 is interesting because the continuous variables (w) drive the model.Some solvers have numerical problems on app2 models: some solutions found violate the constraints by a small amount.app2 and app3 models are easy to solve. But they don't solve fast enough for the time limit I have in mind so I'd like to propose them for inclusion in MIPLIB. | 0.000000 | - |
MIC Top 5 | app2-2 [MIPLIB] | Emilie Danna | The archive contains 5 instances coming from 3 applications.app1 is interesting because the continuous variables (w) drive the model.Some solvers have numerical problems on app2 models: some solutions found violate the constraints by a small amount.app2 and app3 models are easy to solve. But they don't solve fast enough for the time limit I have in mind so I'd like to propose them for inclusion in MIPLIB. | 0.321455 | 1 |
dale-cta [MIPLIB] | Jordi Castro | Set of MILP instances of the CTA (Controlled Tabular Adjustment) problem, a method to protect statistical tabular data, belonging to the field of SDC (Statistical Disclosure Control). Raw data of instances are real or pseudo-real, provided by several National Statistical Agencies. We generated the CTA problem for these data. | 0.364035 | 2 | |
h80x6320 [MIPLIB] | MIPLIB submission pool | Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. | 0.529082 | 3 | |
stein9inf [MIPLIB] | MIPLIB submission pool | Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. | 0.766369 | 4 | |
flugplinf [MIPLIB] | MIPLIB submission pool | Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. | 0.768196 | 5 | |
MIPLIB Top 5 | app2-2 [MIPLIB] | Emilie Danna | The archive contains 5 instances coming from 3 applications.app1 is interesting because the continuous variables (w) drive the model.Some solvers have numerical problems on app2 models: some solutions found violate the constraints by a small amount.app2 and app3 models are easy to solve. But they don't solve fast enough for the time limit I have in mind so I'd like to propose them for inclusion in MIPLIB. | 0.321455 | 1 |
neos-5140963-mincio [MIPLIB] | Jeff Linderoth | (None provided) | 1.100112 | 87 | |
sp97ic [MIPLIB] | J. Goessens, S. v. Hoessel, L. Kroon | Railway line planning instance | 2.226747 | 813 | |
sp97ar [MIPLIB] | J. Goessens, S. v. Hoessel, L. Kroon | Railway line planning instance. Solved with Gurobi 4.5.1 on a 12-core Linux system in 2678.77 sec. | 2.383802 | 859 | |
sp98ar [MIPLIB] | J. Goessens, S. v. Hoessel, L. Kroon | Railway line planning instance | 2.600317 | 895 |
app2-1: Instance-to-Model Comparison Results
Model Group Assignment from MIPLIB: | app |
Assigned Model Group Rank/ISS in the MIC: | 115 / 2.876 |
MIC Top 5 Model Groups
These are the 5 model group composite (MGC) images that are most similar to the decomposed CCM image for the query instance, according to the ISS metric.![]() ![]() |
These are model group composite (MGC) images for the MIC top 5 model groups.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Name | drayage | neos-pseudoapplication-74 | neos-pseudoapplication-89 | neos-pseudoapplication-109 | neos-pseudoapplication-2 | |
Rank / ISS
The image-based structural similarity (ISS) metric measures the Euclidean distance between the image-based feature vectors for the query instance and all other instances. A smaller ISS value indicates greater similarity.
|
1 / 1.212 | 2 / 1.362 | 3 / 1.370 | 4 / 1.408 | 5 / 1.478 |
Model Group Summary
The table below contains summary information for the five most similar model groups to app2-1 according to the MIC.
MODEL GROUP | SUBMITTER | DESCRIPTION | ISS | RANK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIC Top 5 | drayage | F. Jordan Srour | The .rar file contains three folders: 1) R_mps with all of the models (165, organized into 5 groups R0_, R25_, R50_, R75_, and R100_*), 2) results_and_runtimes with datafiles on the runtime and results, and 3) doc with documentation on the models in the form of a pdf. | 1.212073 | 1 |
neos-pseudoapplication-74 | Jeff Linderoth | (None provided) | 1.361528 | 2 | |
neos-pseudoapplication-89 | NEOS Server Submission | Model coming from the NEOS Server with unknown application | 1.369935 | 3 | |
neos-pseudoapplication-109 | Jeff Linderoth | (None provided) | 1.407773 | 4 | |
neos-pseudoapplication-2 | NEOS Server Submission | Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. | 1.477629 | 5 |