×
![]()
neos-pseudoapplication-13
| Type: | Model Group |
| Submitter: | NEOS Server Submission |
| Description: | Model coming from the NEOS Server with unknown application |
Parent Model Group (neos-pseudoapplication-13)
All other model groups below were be compared against this "query" model group.  |
 |
|
Model Group Composite (MGC) image
Composite of the decomposed CCM images for every instance in the query model group.
|
Component Instances (Decomposed)
These are the decomposed CCM images for each instance in the query model group. |
These are component instance images.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Name | neos-953928 | neos-3691541-lonja | ns1828997 | neos-4300652-rahue | neos-1337307 |
MIC Top 5 Model Groups
These are the 5 MGC images that are most similar to the MGC image for the query model group, according to the ISS metric. |
FIXME - These are model group composite images.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Name | neos-pseudoapplication-98 | milo | neos-pseudoapplication-12 | neos-pseudoapplication-37 | exp_and_fc | |
|
Rank / ISS
The image-based structural similarity (ISS) metric measures the Euclidean distance between the image-based feature vectors for the query model group and all other model groups. A smaller ISS value indicates greater similarity.
|
1 / 1.834 | 2 / 1.872 | 3 / 1.910 | 4 / 1.920 | 5 / 1.929 |
Model Group Summary
The table below contains summary information for neos-pseudoapplication-13, and for the five most similar model groups to neos-pseudoapplication-13 according to the MIC.
| MODEL GROUP | SUBMITTER | DESCRIPTION | ISS | RANK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent Model Group | neos-pseudoapplication-13 | NEOS Server Submission | Model coming from the NEOS Server with unknown application | 0.000000 | - |
| MIC Top 5 | neos-pseudoapplication-98 | NEOS Server Submission | Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. | 1.834324 | 1 |
| milo | Tamas Terlaky | The models come from structural design optimization where the objective is to minimize the total weight of 2 and 3 dimensional cantilevers. The 2D examples are simpler, and GuRobi can solve the 40_1 and 58_1 models, while struggles with 75_1. The 3D examples are more challenging. The x_0 and x_1 models are two different modeling of the same identical problems, so their optimal value is the same. The 1_x and 2_x problems are solved by GuRoBi, the 3_x and 4_x are not solved in reasonable time. | 1.872480 | 2 | |
| neos-pseudoapplication-12 | NEOS Server Submission | Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. | 1.910373 | 3 | |
| neos-pseudoapplication-37 | Jeff Linderoth | (None provided) | 1.919988 | 4 | |
| exp_and_fc | MIPLIB submission pool | Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. | 1.928757 | 5 |
