×
neos-pseudoapplication-17
Type: | Model Group |
Submitter: | Jeff Linderoth |
Description: | (None provided) |
Parent Model Group (neos-pseudoapplication-17)
All other model groups below were be compared against this "query" model group.![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Model Group Composite (MGC) image
Composite of the decomposed CCM images for every instance in the query model group.
|
Component Instances (Decomposed)
These are the decomposed CCM images for each instance in the query model group.![]() ![]() |
These are component instance images.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Name | neos-5079731-flyers | neos-5102383-irwell | neos-5076235-embley | neos-5093327-huahum | neos-5100895-inster |
MIC Top 5 Model Groups
These are the 5 MGC images that are most similar to the MGC image for the query model group, according to the ISS metric.![]() ![]() |
FIXME - These are model group composite images.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Name | exp_and_fc | neos-pseudoapplication-73 | milo | control | cvs | |
Rank / ISS
The image-based structural similarity (ISS) metric measures the Euclidean distance between the image-based feature vectors for the query model group and all other model groups. A smaller ISS value indicates greater similarity.
|
1 / 1.737 | 2 / 1.740 | 3 / 1.753 | 4 / 1.867 | 5 / 1.886 |
Model Group Summary
The table below contains summary information for neos-pseudoapplication-17, and for the five most similar model groups to neos-pseudoapplication-17 according to the MIC.
MODEL GROUP | SUBMITTER | DESCRIPTION | ISS | RANK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parent Model Group | neos-pseudoapplication-17 | Jeff Linderoth | (None provided) | 0.000000 | - |
MIC Top 5 | exp_and_fc | MIPLIB submission pool | Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. | 1.736784 | 1 |
neos-pseudoapplication-73 | NEOS Server Submission | Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. | 1.740389 | 2 | |
milo | Tamas Terlaky | The models come from structural design optimization where the objective is to minimize the total weight of 2 and 3 dimensional cantilevers. The 2D examples are simpler, and GuRobi can solve the 40_1 and 58_1 models, while struggles with 75_1. The 3D examples are more challenging. The x_0 and x_1 models are two different modeling of the same identical problems, so their optimal value is the same. The 1_x and 2_x problems are solved by GuRoBi, the 3_x and 4_x are not solved in reasonable time. | 1.752947 | 3 | |
control | Qie He | Optimal control of a discrete-time switched system model Numerically challenging. Different solvers report this model as solved to optimality, infeasible, or unbounded. | 1.867225 | 4 | |
cvs | Michael Bastubbe | Capacitated vertex separator problem on randomly generated hypergraph with 128 vertices and 89 hyperedges in at most 16 components each including at most 8 vertices. solved with default GCG/Soplex in about 2000 seconds. | 1.885547 | 5 |