prod2: Instance-to-Instance Comparison Results

Type: Instance
Submitter: MIPLIB submission pool
Description: Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions.
MIPLIB Entry

Parent Instance (prod2)

All other instances below were be compared against this "query" instance.

prod2 Raw prod2 Decomposed prod2 Composite of MIC top 5 prod2 Composite of MIPLIB top 5 prod2 Model Group Composite
Raw This is the CCM image before the decomposition procedure has been applied.
Decomposed This is the CCM image after a decomposition procedure has been applied. This is the image used by the MIC's image-based comparisons for this query instance.
Composite of MIC Top 5 Composite of the five decomposed CCM images from the MIC Top 5.
Composite of MIPLIB Top 5 Composite of the five decomposed CCM images from the MIPLIB Top 5.
Model Group Composite Image Composite of the decomposed CCM images for every instance in the same model group as this query.

MIC Top 5 Instances

These are the 5 decomposed CCM images that are most similar to decomposed CCM image for the the query instance, according to the ISS metric.

Decomposed These decomposed images were created by GCG.
prod1 decomposed opt1217 decomposed milo-v12-6-r1-58-1 decomposed loopha13 decomposed milo-v12-6-r1-75-1 decomposed
Name prod1 [MIPLIB] opt1217 [MIPLIB] milo-v12-6-r1-58-1 [MIPLIB] loopha13 [MIPLIB] milo-v12-6-r1-75-1 [MIPLIB]
Rank / ISS The image-based structural similarity (ISS) metric measures the Euclidean distance between the image-based feature vectors for the query instance and all other instances. A smaller ISS value indicates greater similarity.
1 / 0.754 2 / 0.895 3 / 0.900 4 / 0.902 5 / 0.908
Raw These images represent the CCM images in their raw forms (before any decomposition was applied) for the MIC top 5.
prod1 raw opt1217 raw milo-v12-6-r1-58-1 raw loopha13 raw milo-v12-6-r1-75-1 raw

MIPLIB Top 5 Instances

These are the 5 instances that are most closely related to the query instance, according to the instance statistic-based similarity measure employed by MIPLIB 2017

Decomposed These decomposed images were created by GCG.
prod1 decomposed mad decomposed roi2alpha3n4 decomposed ns1208400 decomposed neos-1171448 decomposed
Name prod1 [MIPLIB] mad [MIPLIB] roi2alpha3n4 [MIPLIB] ns1208400 [MIPLIB] neos-1171448 [MIPLIB]
Rank / ISS The image-based structural similarity (ISS) metric measures the Euclidean distance between the image-based feature vectors for the query instance and all model groups. A smaller ISS value indicates greater similarity.
1 / 0.754 222 / 1.194 469 / 1.408 724 / 1.712 960 / 3.012
Raw These images represent the CCM images in their raw forms (before any decomposition was applied) for the MIPLIB top 5.
prod1 raw mad raw roi2alpha3n4 raw ns1208400 raw neos-1171448 raw

Instance Summary

The table below contains summary information for prod2, the five most similar instances to prod2 according to the MIC, and the five most similar instances to prod2 according to MIPLIB 2017.

INSTANCE SUBMITTER DESCRIPTION ISS RANK
Parent Instance prod2 [MIPLIB] MIPLIB submission pool Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. 0.000000 -
MIC Top 5 prod1 [MIPLIB] MIPLIB submission pool Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. 0.754176 1
opt1217 [MIPLIB] MIPLIB submission pool Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. 0.894760 2
milo-v12-6-r1-58-1 [MIPLIB] Tamas Terlaky The models come from structural design optimization where the objective is to minimize the total weight of 2 and 3 dimensional cantilevers. The 2D examples are simpler, and GuRobi can solve the 40_1 and 58_1 instances, while struggles with 75_1. The 3D examples are more challenging. The x_0 and x_1 models are two different modeling of the same identical problems, so their optimal value is the same. The 1_x and 2_x problems are solved by GuRoBi, the 3_x and 4_x are not solved in reasonable time. 0.899770 3
loopha13 [MIPLIB] Hamideh This is a Gams model which uses CPLEX as a solver. 0.902448 4
milo-v12-6-r1-75-1 [MIPLIB] Tamas Terlaky The models come from structural design optimization where the objective is to minimize the total weight of 2 and 3 dimensional cantilevers. The 2D examples are simpler, and GuRobi can solve the 40_1 and 58_1 instances, while struggles with 75_1. The 3D examples are more challenging. The x_0 and x_1 models are two different modeling of the same identical problems, so their optimal value is the same. The 1_x and 2_x problems are solved by GuRoBi, the 3_x and 4_x are not solved in reasonable time. 0.907900 5
MIPLIB Top 5 prod1 [MIPLIB] MIPLIB submission pool Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. 0.754176 1
mad [MIPLIB] Koichi Fujii Mean-Absolute Deviation Model for Car Dealerships 1.194124 222
roi2alpha3n4 [MIPLIB] Domenico Salvagnin Neurobiology application: optimal placing of sensors on the scalp to maximize signal on a given ROI, also taking uniformity of coverage into account. 1.407877 469
ns1208400 [MIPLIB] NEOS Server Submission Instance coming from the NEOS Server with unknown application 1.712189 724
neos-1171448 [MIPLIB] NEOS Server Submission Imported from the MIPLIB2010 submissions. 3.012023 960


prod2: Instance-to-Model Comparison Results

Model Group Assignment from MIPLIB: no model group assignment
Assigned Model Group Rank/ISS in the MIC: N.A. / N.A.

MIC Top 5 Model Groups

These are the 5 model group composite (MGC) images that are most similar to the decomposed CCM image for the query instance, according to the ISS metric.

These are model group composite (MGC) images for the MIC top 5 model groups.
Model group: bnatt Model group: neos-pseudoapplication-40 Model group: neos-pseudoapplication-74 Model group: hypothyroid Model group: neos-pseudoapplication-63
Name bnatt neos-pseudoapplication-40 neos-pseudoapplication-74 hypothyroid neos-pseudoapplication-63
Rank / ISS The image-based structural similarity (ISS) metric measures the Euclidean distance between the image-based feature vectors for the query instance and all other instances. A smaller ISS value indicates greater similarity.
1 / 1.659 2 / 1.684 3 / 1.695 4 / 1.741 5 / 1.760

Model Group Summary

The table below contains summary information for the five most similar model groups to prod2 according to the MIC.

MODEL GROUP SUBMITTER DESCRIPTION ISS RANK
MIC Top 5 bnatt Tatsuya Akutsu We are submitting ILP data for identification of a singletonattractor in a Boolean newtork, which is a well-known problemin computational systems biology.This problem is known to be NP-hard and we developed a methodto transform an model of the problem to an integer linearprogram (ILP).We used ILPs from artificially generated Boolean networks ofindegree 3.The size of the networks are: 350, 400, 500.Even for the case of 500, we could not find a solution within6 hours using CPLEX 11.2 on a PC with XEON 5470 3.33GHz CPU.(This ILP corresponds to the case of size=350.File format is (zipped) CPLEX LP format.)The details of the method appeared in:T. Akutsu, M. Hayashida and T. Tamura, Integer programming-basedmethods for attractor detection and control of Boolean networks,Proc. The combined 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Controland 28th Chinese Control Conference (IEEE CDC/CCC 2009), 5610-5617, 2009. 1.658678 1
neos-pseudoapplication-40 Jeff Linderoth (None provided) 1.684492 2
neos-pseudoapplication-74 Jeff Linderoth (None provided) 1.694789 3
hypothyroid Gleb Belov Linearized Constraint Programming models of the MiniZinc Challenges 2012-2016. I should be able to produce versions with indicator constraints supported by Gurobi and CPLEX, however don't know if you can use them and if there is a standard format. These MPS were produced by Gurobi 7.0.2 using the MiniZinc develop branch on eb536656062ca13325a96b5d0881742c7d0e3c38 1.741389 4
neos-pseudoapplication-63 Jeff Linderoth (None provided) 1.759581 5